Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Henry miller on dissolving into one's art and the power of grit compared to genius

From http://www.brainpickings.org/2015/01/21/to-paint-is-to-love-again-henry-miller/

The practice of any art demands more than mere savoir faire. One must not only be in love with what one does, one must also know how to make love. In love self is obliterated. Only the beloved counts. Whether the beloved be a bowl of fruit, a pastoral scene, or the interior of a bawdy house makes no difference. One must be in it and of it wholly. Before a subject can be transmuted aesthetically it must be devoured and absorbed. If it is a painting it must perspire with ecstasy.

To win through by sheer force of genius is one thing; to survive and continue to create when every last door is slammed in one’s face is another. Nobody acquires genius — it is God-given. But one can acquire patience, fortitude, wisdom, understanding. Perhaps the greatest gift [is] to love what one does whether it causes a stir or not.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

The importance of perseverance and practice

Posted: 07 Jan 2015 12:30 AM PST
“Limitation is the condition of our lives. What matters — what allows us to reach beyond ourselves, as we are, and push at the boundaries of our ability — is that we continue. But then everything depends on how we practice, what we practice.”
In her sublime memoir of the writing life, Dani Shapiro wrote: “The job — as well as the plight, and the unexpected joy — of the artist is to embrace uncertainty, to be sharpened and honed by it.” But the sharpening-and-honing itself rarely feels like a joy when you are mid-leap into the unknown, with no guarantee of whether your daily act of showing up — of practice and perseverance — will ever amount to the development of greatness. After all, Oscar Wilde famously quipped that “only mediocrities develop.” And yet here we are a century later, heeding psychologists’ growing body of evidence that “grit” is far more important than “talent” and that practice with a feedback loop is the surest road to success. Even so, the cult of inborn talent endures — after all, it is hard-baked into our cultural mythology of genius — and continues to oppress aspiring artists. “In every musician’s mind lurks the fear that practicing is merely busywork, that you are either born to your instrument or you are an impostor,” writes Glenn Kurtz in Practicing: A Musician’s Return to Music (public library) — his spectacular memoir of creative homecoming, brimming with vital and poetically articulated wisdom on the artist’s life, deeply resonant for every field of creative endeavor.
Having grown up playing guitar and working to become a professional musician as a young adult, studying at a conservatory and winning some competitions along the way, Kurtz found himself disillusioned and exasperated with his progress, with the disheartening sense that “ambition and expectation are sometimes not enough.” So he gave up the dream of becoming an artist, borrowed a book from the New York Public Library to learn typing, and got himself a “real” job as an editorial assistant in New York, to which he walked twenty blocks to work every morning, “stunned and heartbroken, a sleepwalker.”
Illustration from 'About Time' by Vahram Muratyan. Click image for more.
Kurtz writes:
Every day felt like the waste of my entire life. For fifteen years I had practiced to become an artist. But I’d misunderstood what that meant… Most people give up their fantasies of art, exploration, and invention. I was furious at myself for having believed I was different, and even more furious that I wasn’t.
That anguishing personal emptiness was only compounded by New York’s merciless collective cult of self-actualization, which left Kurtz even more crestfallen about the trajectory of his life:
There was more movement, more intense ambition and envy in one block of New York City than in all of Vienna. But I had no part in it. There was nothing here that I wanted. I was walking home from a boring job, lost in a crowd of blue, gray, and brown business suits, skirting oncoming cars like a scuttling pigeon, because I had given up. My fingers were not to blame; nor were my parents, my teachers, music history, or my instrument. With every step I felt more harshly how I had failed, how fundamentally I had betrayed myself. Out of fear of being mediocre, I’d listened to the wrong voices. I’d been practicing all the wrong things.
[…]
Everyone who gives up a serious childhood dream — of becoming an artist, a doctor, an engineer, an athlete — lives the rest of their life with a sense of loss, with nagging what ifs.
[…]
Only a very few loves can disappoint you so fundamentally that you feel you’ve lost yourself when they’re gone. Quitting music wounded me as deeply as any relationship in my life. It was my first great loss, this innocent, awkward failure to live with what I heard and felt. For more than ten years I avoided music. It hurt too much. My anger went as deep as my love had gone. I suppose this is natural. In the aftermath of something so painful, we subsist on bitterness, which sustains us against even greater loss.
So he did something few have the courage to do — after a fifteen-year detour from his true calling, he decided to let his life speak and face that menacing what-if head on by returning to his great love. That homecoming to music was made possible by his deep commitment to practicing — “a process of continual reevaluation, an attempt to bring growth to repetition,” a delicate act that “teaches us the sweet, bittersweet joy of development, of growth, of change” — day in and day out.
Indeed, anyone who has ever experienced the “spiritual electricity” of creative flow can relate to Kurtz’s electrifying account of this transcendent process-state and easily substitute his or her instrument of choice — the pen, the camera, the keyboard — for his guitar:
Each note rubs the others just right, and the instrument shivers with delight. The feeling is unmistakable, intoxicating. When a guitar is perfectly in tune, its strings, its whole body will resonate in sympathetic vibration, the true concord of well-tuned sounds. It is an ancient, hopeful metaphor, an instrument in tune, speaking of pleasure on earth and order in the cosmos, the fragility of beauty, and the quiver in our longing for love.
Illustration from 'Herman and Rosie' by Gus Gordon. Click image for more.
Kurtz captures beautifully the enchanting absorption and tactile immediacy of this creative flow:
I concentrate on the simplest task, to play all the notes at precisely the same moment, with one thought, one motion. It takes a few minutes; sometimes, on bad days, it takes all morning. I take my time. But I cannot proceed without this unity of thought, motion, and sound.
[…]
I play deliberately, building a triangle of sound — fingertip, ear, fingertip — until my hands become aware of each other.
In a sentiment that calls to mind young Virginia Woolf’s memorable meditation on the bodily ecstasy of music, he adds:
My attention warms and sharpens, and I shape the notes more carefully. I remember now that music is vibration, a disturbance in the air. I remember that music is a kind of breathing, an exchange of energy and excitement. I remember that music is physical, not just in the production of sounds, in the instrumentalist’s technique, but as an experience. Making music changes my body, eliciting shivers, sobs, or the desire to dance. I become aware of myself, of these sensations that lie dormant until music brings them out. And in an instant the pleasure, the effort, the ambition and intensity of playing grip me and shake me awake. I feel as if I’ve been wandering aimlessly until now, as if all the time I’m not practicing, I’m a sleepwalker.
[…]
Listening, drawing sound, motion, and thought together, I find my concentration. My imagination opens and reaches out. And in that reaching I begin to recognize myself.
Practicing in such a way, Kurtz points out, is an embodied experience rather than one that takes place in the mind’s maze of abstraction — it makes the “whole body alive with aspiration.” Indeed, these two modalities are often in conflict — in one of his many insightful asides, Kurtz issues an admonition that, like the book itself, applies with equal precision to all creative endeavors:
It’s dangerous for a musician to philosophize instead of practicing. The grandeur of music, to be heard, must be played.
And in the playing — as in the writing, or the painting, or the knitting — is where we find the gateway to mastery:
Each day … practicing is the same task, this essential human gesture — reaching out for an ideal, for the grandeur of what you desire, and feeling it slip through your fingers.
The daily showing up and reaching out is, indeed, where the crucial difference between success and mastery lies, as does Lewis Hyde’s essential dichotomy between work and creative labor. Kurtz captures this elegantly:
Together this pleasure in music and the discipline of practice engage in an endless tussle, a kind of romance. The sense of joy justifies the labor; the labor, I hope, leads to joy. This, at least, is the bargain I quietly make with myself each morning as I sit down. If I just do my work, then pleasure, mastery will follow. Even the greatest artists must make the same bargain.
[…]
Practicing is striving; practicing is a romance. But practicing is also a risk, a test of character, a threat of deeply personal failure… Every day I collide with my limits, the constraints of my hands, my instrument, and my imagination. Each morning when I sit down, I’m bewildered by a cacophony of voices, encouraging and dismissive, joyous and harsh, each one a little tyrant, each one insisting on its own direction. And I struggle to harmonize them, to find my way between them, uncertain whether this work is worth it or a waste of my time.
Illustration from 'The Fantastic Jungles of Henri Rousseau,' the heartening story of how the iconic painter attained creative success in his later years, after a lifetime of hard work and rejection. Click image for more.
Quoting harpsichordist Wanda Landowska — “If everyone knew how to work, everyone would be a genius!” — Kurtz writes:
Practicing is training; practicing is meditation and therapy. But before any of these, practicing is a story you tell yourself, a bildungsroman, a tale of education and self-realization. For the fingers as for the mind, practicing is an imaginative, imaginary arc, a journey, a voyage. You must feel you are moving forward. But it is the story that leads you on.
[…]
From the outside, practicing may not seem like much of a story… Yet practicing is the fundamental story. Whether as a musician, as an athlete, at your job, or in love, practice gives direction to your longing, gives substance to your labor.
Indeed, this fundamental story of practicing is what lies beneath our culture’s fascination with daily routines, which always harbor the question of what propels the impulse to show up day after day after day in the service of one’s private creative enterprise. Kurtz offers a compelling answer:
Every day you go to the gym or sit down at your desk. The work is not always interesting, not always fun. Sometimes it is tedious. Sometimes it is infuriating. Why do you continue? Why did you start in the first place? You must have an answer that helps you persevere… Without telling yourself some story of practicing, without imagining a path to your goal, the aggravation and effort seem pointless. And without faith in the story you create, the hours of doubt and struggle and the endless repetition feel like torture.
[…]
Practicing is a story, but not one in “square time,” not a simple path to perfection. Instead, it is a myth you weave to draw up the many strands of your doubt and desire… The story you tell yourself … must embrace everything you experience when you sit down in the presence of your ideal.
[…]
When you sit down to practice, however casually, you cast yourself as the hero and victim of your own myth. You will encounter obstacles; you will struggle, succeed, and struggle some more. The story of your practice weaves all this together, absorbing what is within you and making it productive. Because when you truly believe your story of practicing, it has the power to turn routine into a route, to resolve your discordant voices, and to transform the harshest, most intense disappointment into the very reason you continue.
Unflinching belief in that master-story is also what allows us to transcend the daily rebellions of our bodies and minds, and to go on practicing:
Artistry may seem divine, but practicing is always mundane. Practice immerses you in your daily self — this body, these moods… You struggle with mistakes and flaws. The work is physical, intellectual, psychological. It can be exhilarating and aggravating, fulfilling and terribly lonesome. But it is always just you, the instrument, and the music, here, now. Practicing is the truth of who you are, today, as you strive to change, to make yourself better, to become someone new. The goal is always to bring old notes to life. Even so, while you sit down to work every day, it may take years before you know what you’ve practiced.
And therein lies Kurtz’s most assuring wisdom:
Limitation is the condition of our lives. What matters — what allows us to reach beyond ourselves, as we are, and push at the boundaries of our ability — is that we continue. But then everything depends on how we practice, what we practice.
[…]
I sit down to practice the fullness of my doubts and desire, my fantasies and flaws. Each day I follow them as far as I can bear it, for now. This is what teaches me my limits; this is what enables me to improve. I think it is the same with anything you seriously practice, anything you deeply love.
Practicing is an infinitely rewarding and ennobling read in its totality. Complement it with Dani Shapiro on the pleasures and perils of the creative life and Debbie Millman on the courage to choose the uncertain what-if.

Tending to your inner garden and healing

From brainpickings.
Rainer Maria Rilke
 Rilke on What Winter Teaches Us about the Riches of Life and the Tenacity of the Human Spirit
Tending my inner garden went splendidly this winter. Suddenly to be healed again and aware that the very ground of my being — my mind and spirit — was given time and space in which to go on growing; and there came from my heart a radiance I had not felt so strongly for a long time… You tell me how you are able to feel fully alive every moment of the day and that your inner life is brimming over; you write in the knowledge that what you have, if one looks at it squarely, outweighs and cancels all possible privations and losses that may later come along. It is precisely this that was borne in upon me more conclusively than ever before as I worked away during the long Winter months: that the stages by which life has become impoverished correspond with those earlier times when excesses of wealth were the accustomed measure. What, then, is there to fear? Only forgetting! But you and I, around us and in us, we have so much in store to help us remember!
Philosopher Joanna Macy’s soul-gladdening A Year with Rilke: Daily Readings from the Best of Rainer Maria Rilke — which also gave us Rilke’s magnificent letters on how befriending death helps us live more fully — includes an excerpt of this letter, translated by Macy herself thusly:
You might notice that in some ways the effects of our winter experiences are similar. You write of a constant sense of fullness, an almost overabundance of inner being, which from the outset counterbalances and compensates all deprivations and losses that might possibly come. In the course of my work this last long winter, I have experienced a truth more completely than ever before: that life’s bestowal of riches already surpasses any subsequent impoverishment. What, then, remains to be feared? Only that we might forget this! But around and within us, how much it helps to remember!
In his final letter to Heise in February of 1924, by which point she had gotten back on her feet, Rilke echoes this faith in the tenacity of the human spirit and our resilient capacity for joy. Needham’s translation:
Do you not have an increasing sense that underlying one’s own preparedness to accept whatever fate may bring there is a warm, sincere, frightened yet daring unchangeability? And what does living come down to but bringing about those changes in ourselves which we have daringly attempted and which can free us to enjoy a richness and closeness with everyone? After so much honest progress you have now come thus far: that you can live humbly and with the clear expectation that nothing untrue will, nor indeed can, ever find its way in to your heart, for you have that voice within you which merits your safe trust, your utmost faithfulness, and your joy.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

My SOP for IIT Gandhinagar

Buddha said that “Our life is the creation of our mind.”
Everything that’s ever happened to you has happened inside your skull. - David McRaney.

These statements summarise our entire life and how it happens. When you learn yoga, you are invariably introduced to the mind, its intricacies and its innate strength. You may even get bewildered by its supernaturalistic power. Yoga says that the mind is past impressions. If you live out of your mind, it will replay the same installed programs and your future will look like your past. So, it was through my experience with yoga over the last 3 years that I became extremely interested in the human mind and its workings. That was the time when I was searching for my passion and wanted to devote myself to the study of things that I was passionate about.

The practise of mindfulness or awareness led me to the inner corridors of the mysteries of the human mind. The more I worked with computers, the more I fell in love with humans. Human beings are infinitely more interesting than computers and I became a social observer. The biggest and probably the only tool that we all have, in order to explore the world was ourselves - our minds - the experiences it created, the beliefs, thoughts, emotions and desires. I started observing myself and people around me and I was fascinated by our behaviour. Many a times we acted like pre-programmed machines. It was so difficult to change one’s patterns. We made irrational mistakes. We jumped to wrong conclusions. We worked in auto pilot. We had a set of cultural prejudices and biases. We created personalities and our actions reinforced our personality. We liked to be slotted and labelled and identified. We chased success and happiness without sometimes fully understanding what we mean by these terms. So human life looked like a well intended but badly mixed cocktail with the mind playing conman and deluding us.

For all the advances in technology it appeared to me that the human mind carried certain hard wired evolutionary baggages that were no longer valid in today’s modern world. I read about cognitive biases and the range of positive illusions created by the mind for the purpose of motivation, survival and emotional stability. These cognitive biases explained why some people were optimistic and more likely to succeed and how others were setting up for failure. I read about the stories that we constructed without evidence and how we based our beliefs on such poorly constructed narratives. I was interested in the works of Harvard psychologist Dan Gilbert, Mc Combs professor Raj Raghunathan, psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, positive psychology father Martin Seligman, psychotherapist Ernest Rossi and journalist psychologist David Mc Raney. I read a little about the subconcious mind and how we do so many actions unconsciously. That brought up questions like - how is the subconcious programmed in the first place. Once a wrong program is inserted, it would result in wrong actions, wouldn’t it? I became interested to know more about Freud’s studies on the subconcious mind as this programming seemed to be at the heart of many of our issues.

The most fascinating aspect of all was, how do we bring about change? The ability to change your mind, is the key to happiness. How then, do we debug the mind? Using the same mind, right? A tool debugging and auto correcting itself - is amazing. In our projects we have done live updates, where we load a new version of software while another is running and switch to it. It’s a very complex process even for a piece of software. In that sense I wondered how the contents of the mind were changed while the mind was in action. How do parts of it get reprogrammed? How is memory stored? How do we translate our memory into stories? The entire science of it - psychologically and neurobiologically was fascinating. As someone who has undergone the complex process of in-vitro-fertilization I know how impossible it is to replicate all the chemical signalling happening inside the human body for any single function. So, I am fully aware that today, it would be impossible to recreate the human mind. It may take us forever to discover the human mind - its organization, processes, biology and evolution in entirety and no single stream - philosophy or psychology or neuroscience can completely answer the puzzles of the mind. Even a combined approach such as cognitive science can only “hope” to answer and construct a better picture of the mind - its representational structures and computational algorithms and state machines.

So, over the last few years I have occupied myself with TED talks, open courseware from leading international colleges, book reviews and articles about psychology, neuroscience and philosophy. I maintain a blog where I collect articles related to these domains and create my own articles for my friends and family regarding interesting topics like happiness, our behavioural patterns and flaws, success, human values and art. I have a basic understanding of these domains and I hope to understand them systematically through a rigorous and well designed academic program. I aim to understand scientifically the functioning of the human mind and the causes of our behaviour, personality and biases. I hope to understand in depth about how we get programmed by nature and nurture, how to improve our pursuit happiness with higher degree of success and how we can aim to attain professor Mihaly’s states of “flow” for a more fulfulling life. These are the three core areas that I am most interested to pursue for research.

I also aim to understand how each of us represent the world, inside our heads. How do we perceive the world and what forms the reality for each of us? What is the underlying mechanism for human thoughts? How do we gain language expertise and problem solving skills? How do the maps in our heads look like? How can learning a complex language like Chinese increase one’s intelligence? Is there one universal reality? Can we scientifically answer concepts of karma or maya using science? Can we explore the intersection of ancient meditation techniques and modern neuroscience? If there has been found a correlation between transcendental mental states and gamma waves, can that we explored further? Can psychological phenomena be explained via neuroscience experiments? Can we reverse engineer the mind using cognitive science and bring about changes in the society and education system to improve human well being?

My undergraduate degree in Computer Science and my 11 years of work experience in leading technology firms, more specifically, my work in data structures, algorithms, switching and routing protocols and state machines would enable me to easily follow some of the computation related courses. My passion for knowledge acquisition and commitment should help me transcend any shortcomings and lack of exposure to certain topics.

My aim in applying to this course is to gain a breadth of knowledge in my areas of interest from the best faculty in the country. I hope to gather a set of skills which can aid me for a deeper understanding of some areas. I understand that the breadth has to be supported by depth in the three specific areas I hope to do research in, and I hope that my professors at IIT Gandhinagar can guide me towards more focussed programs on completion of the degree - so that I can finally pursue research in one of these areas. I hope to finally pursue a doctoral programme which will enable me to become a teacher and an author. I hope to gain sufficient breadth and depth of knowledge in the intersection of philosophy, psychology and neuroscience which will enable me to write articles and books that can bring about small changes in our culture and education system because, despite so much advancements in all fields, most humans are unhappy. I strongly feel that the increasing emphasis on technological pursuits without enabling a human being with sufficient happiness, self introspection, sufficiency and sustenance tools will lead to increasing cases of mental disorders. Having lived in the US, I know firsthand how common mental disorders are and technology is not the answer to it and probably even worsens it. The time has finally arrived for a science that seeks to understand positive emotion, build strength and virtue, and provide guideposts for finding what Aristotle called the ‘good life’ - says professor Martin Seligman. So scientists and researchers have to address how to behold a positive, optimisitic and healthy mind. The result of our research should form the core of school curriculum and organizational policies. Even laymen should have access to tools for better mental health and mental life and this should be as widespread as mobile phones in India. Early in one’s life, one should be exposed to a sufficient set of tools and knowledge for better well being and success and happiness. The bigger scheme behind my pursuit of the degree is these somewhat unrealistic but yet possible to realize goals. The pursuit of better mental lives should become as common as the pursuit of health and wealth.

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Anjali Menon.. Bangalore Days.

"Actors are just different beings... as a director, one nudges them into feelings and places that may be new to them yet they slowly climb in and take us on a ride that leaves everyone overwhelmed. Respect!" - Anjali Menon.

2014 for me, movie wise was all Bangalore Days.
I watched and re-watched in awe.. the awesome acting.. the settings..the songs.. the story.. the small philosophical messages entwined subtly...it was a treat.

I don't think I have seen any movie like this where the actors brought so much to the movie. ( I don't watch a lot of movies in the first place so I am unqualified to make a sweeping statement). Their expressions were a treat to watch...the insecurities were portrayed so beautifully.

I used to always wonder, how do actors get into the skin of a role. Do they really feel the pain or they're just super talented that their face can express it all? Do the emotions seep into their skin and heart? I would really like to see a movie being made...and watch the actors closely. I want to understand a bit of the process of script writing and film making. Hope someday I get a chance.

Here's a very good review of the movie!
http://cinemachaat.com/2014/11/23/bangalore-days/







Friday, January 9, 2015

The psychological immune system

When life deals out its cruellest blows, our unconscious will be working overtime to find the upside. That’s why life often doesn’t turn out to feel as bad as we think. Soon enough most of us are on our merry way again with a bounce in our step, all thanks to the merciful but covert work of the psychological immune system.

http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/11/the-psychological-immune-system.php

http://www.apa.org/monitor/oct01/strength.aspx

http://www.ted.com/playlists/4/what_makes_you_happy